Dirty Harry: A Classic That Still Packs a Punch... and a Few Uneasy Feelings
Okay, so I finally got around to watching "Dirty Harry" (1971). I know, I know, late to the party! As someone who usually dives deep into world cinema and more arthouse flicks, a cop thriller from the 70s wasn't exactly topping my list. But I'd heard so much about it, especially its controversial legacy, that I had to see what all the fuss was about. And wow, Clint Eastwood is *intense* in this! Harry Callahan's whole 'ends justify the means' attitude definitely makes you squirm, but he's also undeniably effective. Specifically, the scene where he confronts Scorpio in the stadium is just pure cinematic tension. The way he manipulates Scorpio, the dialogue... it's all so raw. On one hand, you're like, 'yeah, get him!' but on the other, you're thinking 'this is *really* pushing some boundaries.' And that's the film's strength, I think. It forces you to grapple with the ethics of law enforcement, even if it does so in a rather, uh, unsubtle way. Plus, San Fransisco looks so gritty and cool and I love watching movies set in the 70s. I kind of wish I knew who the director was! I can understand why it's considered a classic, and why it sparked so much debate. It's definitely not a perfect film, and its politics are... well, complicated to say the least. But its impact on the action genre is undeniable, and Eastwood's performance is iconic – even if it made me feel a little uncomfortable. I probably wouldn't watch it again every year, but I'm glad I finally experienced it. It’s a good reminder that sometimes movies that are highly influential aren’t always the most morally sound, which is important to remember when you’re watching them. Anyone else have strong feelings about "Dirty Harry"? I'd love to hear your takes, especially if you approach it from a more critical perspective than I did!
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!