Asterix vs. Caesar: Is it REALLY all about the magic potion?

Okay cinephiles, Sarah here, back with another deep dive... into the absolutely bonkers world of Asterix! I recently re-watched "Asterix vs. Caesar" (1985) – purely for academic research, obviously ;) – and I've got a theory bubbling better than Getafix's cauldron. We always focus on the magic potion and its role in enabling the Gauls' strength, but I think the REAL key to the film's… well, not success artistically speaking, but impact… is actually the contrast between the worlds director(s) (I'm not sure who directed this thing, sorry!) built. Specifically, look at how Roman civilization is portrayed. Sterile, hyper-organized, and visually flat. Think of the Roman camp: symmetrical layouts, drab uniforms, and Julius Caesar basically lives in a pristine white box. Oppose that to the Gaulish village: vibrant colors, chaotic layouts, and everyone's got a distinct personality (even if they are mostly bickering!). The potion enables physical strength, sure, but the visual language consistently reinforces that the Gauls' strength comes from their individuality, their community, and their sheer joie de vivre. Which the Romans just... lack. Even the humor underscores this. The Roman soldiers are basically interchangeable, constantly getting smacked around, and never seem to learn. The Gauls, even when they're fighting each other, are individuals. So the potion isn't just a plot device; it's a symbol. It represents the inner power that comes from being yourself, that allows the Gauls to resist outside forces. At least, that's my take! And okay, I'll admit it, I always felt bad for Obelix in that particular movie. Falling for Falbala and then bam, she's got a boyfriend. Ouch. Maybe that contributed to my whole "Gauls are individuals with feelings!" reading. He really just wanted to share a boar feast with her, you know? Anyway, let me know what you guys think I am interested in hearing your opinions below!