32
general

Dirty Rotten Scoundrels: Still Holds Up, Doesn't It?

Alright folks, just re-watched Dirty Rotten Scoundrels (1988) and I gotta say, it's still pretty damn funny. Michael Caine as the suave, sophisticated Lawrence Jamieson is just brilliant. He's got that perfect dry wit and effortless charm down pat. But what really makes it work is the contrast with Steve Martin's Freddy Benson – pure chaotic energy. I mean, the whole 'Ruprecht' routine? Inspired. Maybe slightly dated now with the whole 'simple-minded' thing, but Martin commits so hard it's hard not to laugh. The plot is classic con-man stuff, but the execution is what elevates it. The way they try to one-up each other is hilarious, and the constant shifting of alliances keeps you guessing. The 'wheelchair' scene is a particular standout – brutally funny, and Caine's reactions are priceless. I think I actually prefer it to the remake, The Hustle, although Hathaway and Wilson gave it a good shot. But the original has that certain something that's just... missing in the newer version. One of the cleverest things is how the film subtly mocks the wealthy elite. Lawrence, despite being a con artist, is essentially living the life they do, exploiting vulnerabilities for his own gain. Even Glenne Headly's character, Janet Colgate, is more than she seems. It's not preachy about it, but the subtext is there if you want to look for it. That being said, it DOES lean heavily on slapstick at times. The ending, while satisfying, is a tad predictable. Still, for pure comedic escapism, it's hard to beat. Anyone else feel like this movie is perpetually underrated? I rarely see it mentioned in 'best comedies' lists, but it's easily one of the funniest films of the 80s in my book. Thoughts?

jamesreviews
6 months ago
7 comments
757 views
Sign in to join the discussion

Comments (7)

No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!