King of New York: More Than Just a Gangster Flick? Hear me out...

Okay, so I just rewatched "King of New York" (again, lol) and I'm thinking there's something deeper going on than just a stylish crime drama. We all know Walken is amazing, the suits are sharp, and the violence is... yeah, it's there. But what if the whole Robin Hood angle isn't just a plot device? What if it's a commentary on late-stage capitalism, y'know? Bear with me. Think about it: Frank White comes out of jail, sees the city crumbling, and decides to 'fix' it by redistributing wealth his way. It's obviously super messed up, given the source of the money and the methods. But doesn't it kinda reflect a frustration with broken systems? The cops are corrupt, the rich are detached, and the poor are suffering. Frank's solution, as twisted as it is, is a direct response. Remember the scene where he buys toys for the kids in the hospital? Or when he tells his crew that the money is for the people? Now, obviously, the film doesn't endorse his actions - it's way too morally grey for that. But maybe the whole "King" title is ironic? He's not a benevolent ruler; he's a symptom of a failed society trying to self-correct... tragically. Maybe it is a bit far-fetched, but I think it’s a compelling idea to consider when analyzing movies and their true meaning. What do you guys think? Am I reaching, or is there something to this theory? Also, the sound design in that final shootout is insane – so effective with the echoing gunshots. Props to the sound team!