Bram Stoker's Dracula (1992): Over the Top, But I Can't Look Away!
Okay, so I just re-watched 'Bram Stoker's Dracula' (the Coppola one, obvi) and... wow. I forgot just how extra that movie is. Gary Oldman is giving it EVERYTHING, and I mean everything. That hair! That armor! That accent that wanders all over Europe! "Listen to them, the children of the night... what music they make!" - Chef's kiss! It's so deliciously campy. Definitely a feast for the eyes, if not always the brain. Winona Ryder as Mina? I'm still not 100% sold. She's good, don't get me wrong, but I feel like she's overshadowed by pretty much everyone else in the cast. Hopkins as Van Helsing though? Absolute legend. "There are darker things than death." He chews the scenery with such relish (pun intended), it's amazing. And Keanu Reeves as Jonathan Harker... well, let's just say he's got a certain, uh, stiffness about him. Remember that godawful accent? Yikes! Honestly, the whole movie's a hot mess. The effects are super dated, the plot is, shall we say, loosely based on the book, and some of the acting is... questionable. But I can't help but love it. There's something so operatic and bizarre about it that keeps me coming back. Maybe it's the sheer audacity of Coppola's vision? Or maybe I just have a weakness for over-the-top vampire movies. Who knows? Anyway, I'm curious what everyone else thinks. Is it a guilty pleasure? A genuinely good adaptation? Or just a beautiful trainwreck? Let me know! "The blood is the life!" so let's talk Dracula!
Comments (7)
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!